Call for Papers |
 |
IM wants to hear your best
practices and there's no better time to share them with
other IM Providers than the IM Professional Conference
2007. If your proposal is accepted your conference
admission is absolutely FREE! So what are you waiting
for?
SUBMIT YOUR PROPOSAL TODAY!
The deadline for proposals
in May 15, 2007.
|
 |
Magic Week |
 |
An e-mail to
our Clinical Support Department from the therapists at
Benton Schools. |
Is the fourth week of intervention the
magic week?
My student with numerous problems
decoded CVC words FLUENTLY today (as
reported by the resource teacher). In
the past, if he could not decode, he
would explode. Today, he kept trying
until he was able to decode the words.
Mind you, he is a fifth
grader...decoding CVC words...so you can
see how severe his disability is! My
"no clear dominance" child did oustandingly
as well today with increased reps and a
wee bit of patterning on his left
hand...but he didn't need much. Another
of my students also diagnosed with
autism (but is being seen by Deb), ran
to the door and hugged me and said
something nice instead of muttering
obscenities
and borderline obscenities as he walked
APPROPRIATELY down the hall smiling! He
is also being seen by the resource
teacher who reported that he ALSO
decoded words easily (he has been
stubbornly resistant to participating in
the Barton Reading/Spelling program that
the resource teacher uses).
One of Deb's children did 50% SRO in 150
reps. Same child's teacher has been
sending papers home with reports of
"Good handwriting!" He has had chicken
scratches up to this point in time (also
receives OT services). One of Aamie's
who is also one of my language students
reportedly asked appropriate questions
in class, remained on track (as far as
subject matter goes), and did not "pick
on" the students around her to disrupt
them (the paraprofessional who assists
in the room made a point of going to the
child's teacher and relating all that
had occurred). Another of Aamie's (who
just happens to be very close to her
heart)...told two stories each with a
beginning, middle, and end. The
child also recounted an event that
happened to her that affected her
emotionally, but stated something to the
effect...."Well, I am almost in second
grade and shouldn't worry about that!"
I've about
decided we need to IM the world!!!!! Do
you think we are getting good reports
because we are LOOKING to GET good
reports....kind of like the "Placebo
Effect?" As much as possible, we have
been telling out administrators of our
successes. I hope beyond hope the
hard
evidence
will show the same results, and we are
able to obtain an IM unit for our
school. If it bodes well for our
school, I am almost certain we can
convince the district to purchase at
least one more unit and train our SLPs,
PTs, and OTs (not yet trained).
We are
excited about starting round 2 because
we feel we
really
know
what we are doing now. I honestly think
the first round kids may have been a bit
"short changed" because we had so many
snafus at first. If you recall, despite
all of us reminding one another the week
before about how to plug in the device,
I tested my first student all the way
through the LFA having it plugged
incorrectly. Then, since it had been a
while since we were trained and forgot
the # could be changed, I had the
children do
200
reps on the first session! Whew, no
wonder some of them were cross-eyed and
a bit dingy! Funny, isn't it? We NOW
feel we are on a roll with so many of
our students that we hate to stop them,
but we have others we want to bring on
board. Right now, I have 46 children on
my caseload and it has been a struggle
to see my IM-ers for individual
sessions.
Lord have mercy! I could go on and on!
I could go on and on! I hope I haven't
taken up too much of your time with all
my emails. We are all excited about
the current testimonies/results, but I
seem to be the one who writes these LONG
emails to you! My resource teacher
compadre says that speech people (or "speechies"
as Mary called us) tend to be
verbose...and points to me as proof!
|
 |
IM Certification Course Schedule-
Earn .8 CEUs |


Join us for a one-day workshop leading to full
Interactive Metronome (IM) Certification. |
Date |
Location |
5/12 |
Boston, MA
Hurry to Register |
5/12 |
Phoenix, AZ
Hurry to Register |
5/19 |
Miami, FL |
5/19 |
Little Rock, AR |
6/2 |
Baltimore, MD |
6/9 |
Pittsburg, PA |
6/23 |
Orlando, FL |
6/30 |
Dallas,
TX |
6/30 |
Atlanta, GA |
7/14 |
Milwaukee, WI |
7/14 |
San
Francisco, CA |
7/21 |
Lexington, KY |
7/21 |
Houston,
TX |
7/28 |
Portland,
OR |
7/28 |
St. Louis, MO |
8/4 |
San
Antonio, TX |
8/4 |
Detroit,
MI |
8/11 |
Long
Beach, CA |
8/11 |
Columbus,
OH |
8/18 |
Jacksonville, FL |
8/25 |
Biloxi,
MS |
8/25 |
Charlotte, NC |
9/15 |
Seattle,
WA |
9/15 |
Metairie,
LA |
9/22 |
Las
Vegas, NV |
9/28 |
Chicago, IL
Certification Course at the IM
Professional Conference 2007 |
10/6 |
Ft.
Lauderdale, FL |
10/13 |
Denver,
CO |
10/20 |
Indianapolis, IN |
10/20 |
Dallas,
TX |
10/27 |
Tampa, FL |
10/27 |
Phoenix,
AZ |
11/3 |
Trenton,
NJ |
11/3 |
Austin,
TX |
11/10 |
Minneapolis, MN |
11/10 |
San
Francisco, CA |
11/17 |
Birmingham, AL |
12/1 |
Atlanta,
GA |
12/1 |
Portland,
OR |
12/8 |
Wichita,
KS |
12/8 |
Houston,
TX |
12/15 |
Boston,
MA |
12/15 |
Long
Beach, CA |
|
The cost of the course is $200 (individual) or $180 (group of 2 or more)
*Don't see a course
in your area?
Click here to e-mail a Private Course
request (Please include 3 course dates you are
interested in.
*Note:
Courses must be scheduled at least 45 days in
advance) or call 877-994-6776 x230 (US Only) or
954-385-4660 x230
Click here to register today!
|
 |
IM Contact Information: |
If at any time you
need clinical, technical or marketing support, please contact us. We
look forward to helping you making IM succeed in your practice. |
 |
877-994-6776 (US
only)
954-385-4660
Fax: 954-385-4674
|
Clinical Support:
opt. 5 |
Technical Support:
opt. 4 |
Marketing Support:
opt. 6 |
|
|

|
We
are excited to announce that Chicago, IL is the site of
the IM Professional Conference 2007! See the details below: |
Date: |
September 28-30 |
Place:
|
Chicago, IL- Embassy Suites Hotel-O'Hare-Rosemont
click link
above book your sleep rooms ($129/king-$139/2 doubles) |
Cost: |
$349 per person on or before
July 31, 2007
$399 per person after July 31, 2007 |
Group Rates:
(2 or more) |
$329 per person on or before
July 31, 2007
$349
per person after July 31, 2007 |
AOTA & ASHA CEUs:
|
12 |
REGISTER TODAY!
*You do
not have to be an IM Provider to attend
|


Learn
the answers to Frequently Asked Clinical Questions |
 |
Clinical Questions Answered Here |
Get answers to your
clinical questions here. Also be sure to visit the
provider login section of the website and use the FAQ/Best Practices tool.
This exciting new feature lets you search for answers to IM questions by
Diagnosis, Deficit, or both.
You can also e-mail
us your clinical questions at
clinicaled@interactivemetronome.com
|

How
to make decisions on the first day of IM with your
patients
|
 |
QUESTION:
What do I do with
my patient the first day of IM?
ANSWER: Please see the Decision-Making Steps
to Get Started with IM.
Do pre-LFA: observe
performance.
What to look for:
Is the patient able to motor plan/sequence? If
any problems, you will see movements that are choppy,
stilted, groping, poorly sequenced (esp. with feet),
ballistic (hitting very hard with hands), linear instead
of circular, and timing will be random (usually with MS
task average bouncing back and forth between very early
and very late) and patient may have hard time keeping up
with beat of 54 (it may appear to be too fast for them).
Are movements uncoordinated for other reasons?
Ataxia, hemiparesis, etc. You will see timing varies
greatly and patient will have a hard time keeping up
with the beat (at tempo 54).
Does patient hit very early most of the time (> 200
ms)? This indicates problem with impulse-control and
executive functions.
Does patient hit very late most of the time (>200
ms)? This indicates problem with cognitive and/or
auditory processing - processing speed is delayed.
Patient will seem to have trouble keeping up with the
beat.
Does the patient get distracted or perform worse on
the last task of LFA (B Hands with Guide Sounds) as
compared to the other LFA tasks, in particular task 1, B
Hands? If so, this suggests difficulty with auditory
processing and selective attention. If the patient
performed well (within normal range on all LFA tasks)
except for the last task with guide sounds, this patient
is still a candidate for IM to improve processing
skills. Keep in mind that all of the LFA tasks (except
for the last one) are with the ref tone alone and are
very short (30 sec to 1 min in duration)...not long
enough to capture deficits in sustained attention and no
distractions to capture ability to filter distractions
or process auditory information in the presence of
background 'noise.'
Does the patient hit in a manner that is chaotic,
random, and unrelated to the reference tone - what is
referred to as dissociative? This suggests severe
impairment in attention and processing capabilities via
the auditory modality (hearing IM via headphones).
Timing scores will generally be >300 ms and random.
Does the patient continue to clap or tap even after
the ref tone has ceased and the task is finished?
This suggests severe impairment in attention and
executive functions (perseveration).
Does the patient complain or otherwise appear to have
difficulty with the volume of the reference tone and/or
guide sounds during LFA? The patient may turn red,
get flustered, verbalize discomfort, and/or performance
may deteriorate over time during LFA. This suggests
auditory, sensory, and/or cognitive processing deficits
with auditory hypersensitivity.
Does the patient complain of or otherwise exhibit
sensory defensiveness to the IM equipment (headphones,
glove, feel of wires hitting their leg during tasks,
your touch as you put the IM equipment on them?
Timing may be off or may not be...may exhibit trouble
focusing, lack of motivation toward task, or may exhibit
behavioral outburst. This suggests sensory
processing/integration problem.
- To start IM
treatment, you always follow the Six Phases for each
patient regardless of their deficits. It is
patterned after a learning curve. Using hand tasks
only (B Hands, R Hand, L Hand), patients repeat the
same hand tasks over and over in each session until
they learn what to do when they hear the ref tone
(Phase One), then what the guide sounds mean and how
to respond to them when they hear them (Phase Two),
then achieve better rhythm and timing (Phase Three).
Once they've achieved a frame of reference, (okay,
this is what it feels like, this is how I should do
it), then move on to foot, bilateral, and balance
tasks (Phase IV), fine tuning motor planning and
cognitive abilities for short tasks (Phase V), and
finally, improving sustained attention and physical
endurance (Phase VI).
- The goals of your
first IM session (in Phase One) are the following:
- Recognize the beat
is periodic & attempt to synchronize
- Work on basic
focusing & sensory integration skills
- Work on coordinated,
rhythmical movement
Hand exercises (1 – 3)
Short duration (up to 100-200 reps)
Guide sounds off
Use your observations
during LFA to guide you in the first IM treatment
session (*Use hand tasks only in first treatment
session.):
Impairment
|
IM Settings
and Cues Needed |
Motor planning/
sequencing |
Reduce tempo
(40-45); guide sounds off; hand over hand
assist; seated for tasks
|
Uncoordinated
|
Reduce tempo
(40-50); guide sounds off; hand over hand
assist; seated for tasks |
Impulsive
|
Increase tempo
(60); hand over hand assist; visual mode with
score; change difficulty to 300; guide sounds
off; gradually decrease tempo by 1 beat at time
over repeated trials in same session until back
to 54; verbal cues 'slower' as needed; seated
for tasks |
Delayed processing
|
Reduce tempo
(40-45); visual mode (trial shape or score)
(trial with or without center flash to see what
is best); change difficulty to 300; hand over
hand assist and/or verbal cues 'faster’; seated
for tasks |
Auditory
hypersensitivity |
Reduce volume of
ref tone (trial lower settings and ask patient
if better); can go very low in volume if
particularly hypersensitive (i.e., setting of
5). Check for need to reduce tempo also (if
timing seems to be random even though volume is
reduced, may be concurrent deficit in auditory
processing/speed). If also deficit in auditory
processing speed, may benefit from visual mode.
|
Sensory
defensiveness |
Use speakers
instead of headphones; have patient tap your
hand while you wear the glove and trigger;
attach trigger to wall or table and have patient
tap; hold wires while patient wears triggers and
claps to keep them from hitting patient's leg,
etc. |
- Techniques can be
combined for patients who exhibit several of the
above deficits.
- Repeat the same hand
tasks over and over until you get the IM settings
just right from a motor, cognitive, and sensory
standpoint and the patient appears to be trying to
match the beat (even though scores are still poor) -
the intensity and repetition are part of what makes
IM so effective.
- IM is most effective
if provided 2 - 3 times per week. There is always a
pressing need to work on ADLs, self-care, basic
attending, communication and language, behavior
BEFORE IM....it is erroneous to hold off on doing IM
until these goals are accomplished. By tapping into
core functions of attention, processing, executive
functions, and motor planning/sequencing, IM helps
the patient accomplish these goals and others MUCH
faster. If length of stay or insurance
coverage/visits are limited, the best outcomes are
obtained by using IM. Significant gains are seen
within 2-4 weeks at 3x/week (varies from patient to
patient). Some patients meet all of their rehab
goals within 4-6 weeks with IM. More severely
impaired patients require longer IM treatment (up to
60-90 days at 3x/week). They need to know that ADLs
etc improve when doing IM even though they are not
directly working on ADLs...this is the hardest part
mentally for therapists to get over...and what
causes many of them to stick with the familiar and
not use IM.
Areas of improvement
include:
Cognitive Skills
Initiation
Attention-shifting and mental flexibility
(perseveration)
Sustained attention
Selective attention in background noise and other
distractions
Cognitive stamina (fatigue)
Planning
Organization
Sequencing
Prioritization and time-management
Memory
Problem-solving and reasoning
Mathematics
Speed of mental operations
Language Skills
Auditory processing
Auditory comprehension
Word-finding
Reading comprehension and speed
Thought organization and communication
effectiveness/efficiency
Behavioral Skills
Impulse-control/disinhibition
Control of aggression
Social aptitude
Self-esteem and self-confidence
Motor Skills
Balance & stability
Motor planning & sequencing
Coordination
Speed & agility
Endurance
Gait
Gross and fine motor use of prosthetic limbs
(upper and lower extremities)
Handwriting
Sensory Processing Skills
Sensory modulation
Sensory over-responsivity
Sensory under-responsivity
Sensory seeking
Sensory discrimination |

|
 |
QUESTION:
We are concerned
about getting reimbursed for IM. We typically don't get
that many visits approved unless they are seeing more
than 1 discipline. Have you heard of how other places
work
around this?
ANSWER: When it
comes to insurance authorization, getting authorization
for IM services is no different from getting it for
other services provided. Don't ask for authorization
for IM treatment...the insurance company will not
recognize it as IM does not have its own CPT code for
billing. Rather, ask for authorization for "evaluation
and treatment" for "ST", "OT", or "PT." IM is simply a
part of the comprehensive treatment approach. The ST
would bill either Speech-Language Therapy or Cognitive
Development. The OT would bill Therapeutic Activities,
Neuromuscular Reeducation, Cognitive/Perceptual
Training, etc. The PT would bill Gait Training,
Neuromuscular Reeducation, Therapeutic Exercise, etc.
The number of visits authorized by insurance will be
determined by the insurance plan, the treatment
diagnosis, and how the therapist articulates the
treatment approach and documents changes in function as
a result of the interventions provided. Getting
additional visits authorized will depend upon the same.
In general, IM produces
faster results that traditional therapies and works
where other therapies have little effect, so it is
easier to report gains back to insurance companies
in a timely manner. This facilitates getting
authorizations quicker and for the number of visits
requested.
Keep in mind that
insurance companies will look for objective
assessment results when the therapist develops the
treatment plan and as the therapist reports
improvements with IM. As long as the therapist is
documenting changes in function via these pre and
post tests and how the gains are being "carried over
into functional environments....like school) and not
just reporting annectodal gains, this will also
facilitate the process.
Click here to see a listing of CPT & ICD-9 Codes
that have been used for reimbursement.
|
|