Research

Michael I. Posner and Mary K. Rothbart. (2007). Research on Attention Networks as a Model for the Integration of Psychological Science. University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58:1–23

Yoshihiro Miyake (1), Yohei Onishi (1) and Ernst Pöppel (2). (2004). Two types of anticipation in synchronization tapping. (1)
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Midori, Yokohama, Japan; (2) Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Goethestr. Munich, Germany. Acta Neurobiol Exp, 64: 415-426

Michael J. Kane (1), M. Kathryn Blecky (2) , Andrew R. A. Conway (3), and Randall W. Engle (2). (2001). A controlled Attnetion View of Working-Memory Capacity. (1) Georgia State University, (2) Georgia Institue of Technology, (3) University of Illinois at Chicago. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130:2, 169-183

Gershon Ben-Shakhar, and Limor Sheffer. (2001) The relationship between the ability to divide attention and standard measures of general cognitive abilities. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem. Intelligence 29, 293-306.

Warren H. Meck and Aimee M. Benson. (2002). Dissecting the Brain’s Internal Clock: How Frontal – Striatal Circuitry Keeps Time and Shifts Attention. Duke University. Brain and Cognition 48, 195 – 211.

Michael J. Kane and Randall W. Engle. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9 (4) , 637-671.

Michael J. Kane and Randall W. Engle. (2003) Working-Memory Capacity and the Control of Attention: The Contributions of Goal Neglect, Response Competition, and Task Set to Stroop Interference. University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132:1, 47–70.

Michael J. Kane (1), David Z. Hambrick (2), Stephen W. Tuholski (3), Oliver Wilhelm (4), Tabitha W. Payne (4), and Randall W. Engle (4). (2004). The Generality of Working Memory Capacity: A Latent-Variable Approach to Verbal and Visuospatial Memory Span and Reasoning. (1) University of North Carolina at Greensboro, (2) Michigan State University, (3) Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville. (4) Georgia Institute of Technology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189 –217.

Michael D. Hall and Dawn G. Blasko. (2005). Attentional Interference in Judgments of Musical Timbre:Individual Differences in Working Memory. University of Nevada, Las Vegas, The Pennsylvania State University at Erie. The Journal of General Psychology, 2005, 132(1), 94–112.

Harold Pashler (1), James C. Johnston (2) and Eric Ruthruff (2). (2001). Attention and Performance. (1) University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. (2) NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California. Annu. Rev. Psychol, 52:629–51.

Nash Unsworth (1), Josef C. Schrock (2), and Randall W. Engle (1). (2004). Working Memory Capacity and the Antisaccade Task: Individual Differences in Voluntary Saccade Control. (1) Georgia Institute of Technology, (2) Maryville College. Journal of Experimental Psychology: American Psychological Association Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1302–1321

Copyright © 1993 - 2008 Interactive Metronome - All Rights Reserved. United States Patent #5,529,498 & #5,743,744. Additional patents are pending worldwide on the Interactive Metronome, covering all its concepts, designs, related triggers and methods of use. International copyrights cover all IM related computer programs and other related materials. Interactive Metronome is a registered Trademark.